27cents

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Faith and Reason


Perhaps you have heard about the recent advertising campaign for the “no God” option. The slogan, There’s probably is no God: now stop worrying and enjoy your life, has been displayed on public transit in the UK and now Canada. People have taken all kinds of positions on these ads, some welcoming the discussion, some wanting these questions to remain private and personal, and others seeing these messages as hateful or disrespectful. What do you think?

Last Sunday, we began our new series, The God Debate, with the intention of talking about this recent ferment in public theological conversation (a rare event to be sure). We want to respond to the assertions of notable atheists like Richard Dawkins who contend that religion has had far too privileged a position in our culture, and that there is a better, healthier, and more enlightened position: the “no God” option, and all that goes with it. In fact, writers like Dawkins see religion as a delusion, a mistaken and dangerous claim on knowledge. The debate really centers here: what counts as real knowledge? And how can anyone claim to know God?

The Biblical and Christian traditions carry within them the resources to enter such dialogue with profound intellectual depth. One of the best responses to the new atheism from a Christian perspective is Dinesh D’Souza’s best seller What’s So Great About Christianity. I highly recommend it for those who want to go deeper into the questions.

But what about faith? Is faith reasonable? Is faith knowledge? I want to suggest that while faith has its reasons, it is ultimately a way of knowing based on a more personal and engaged stance. Faith is the kind of knowing that comes through encounter and participation. God makes this possible in fact; through Jesus, he has immersed himself in our human story, living it from the inside. The invitation to us is to respond, to participate in the life that Jesus invites us to. One way of seeing Christian baptism is a personal immersion in the life of Jesus to the degree that we begin to know it from the inside. Faith, then, is the kind of knowledge that comes through direct involvement; it is the knowledge of personal participation.

So much of our usual way of thinking about knowledge or truth relates to our Greek intellectual tradition: the Greek word alethia suggests the truth is something that must be uncovered, the reality that lies deeper than appearances. While this is a helpful perspective, for the Greek mind truth had more to do with the world of things versus a world of persons. The Hebrews started their search for knowledge in a different place entirely, beginning as they did with the premise of God (Gen 1:1). So the Hebrew word emet (truth) is more like faithfulness, the quality of a dependable person. For the Hebrews, the possibility of human knowing is grounded in the personal creator-God; truth is grounded in the ultimate Someone we can know.

This means simply that our knowledge of God does not arrive through disengaged analysis, but as we respond to the life he offers. Let me give you a Biblical illustration of this. When Jesus first announced himself to Israel he was baptized by John. John had been prepared in a very special way to recognize Jesus as God’s Messiah, and he said gave witness of this understanding to those who were with him. And while all were intrigued with John’s statements, they did not know what John did, not at first. Their understanding of who Jesus was came through ordinary relational means, through the discovery of shared life.

Because of John’s testimony, two of John’s followers began to follow Jesus, as John 1:38-39 tells us:

Jesus looked around and saw them following. “What do you want?” he asked them.
They replied, “Rabbi” (which means “Teacher”), “where are you staying?”
“Come and see,” he said.


This is how we know God in Jesus. We enter into the life he offers us and try it out from the inside. “Come and see” is in invitation, an act of generous hospitality. Jesus says to us, “step into my life and find out who I am.” Millions of Jesus-followers have come to know him in precisely this way. They know God from the inside of the relationship.

This coming Sunday, we continue our God Debate series with a message on Religion and Science. We hope that you can join us at 9:29 or 11:11 am.

Bob

3 Comments:

  • As a Christian, I don't get worked up by anti-Christian movies or bus banners telling to forget God and have a good time. Everyone has an opinion and they are entitled to theirs and frankly, when we respond with bitterness or offense they win. We take it personally when we shouldn't and if Jesus can handle being crucified without getting angry then I can handle an inflammatory movie or bus banner.

    I tried reading God is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens whom I've always respected as a writer and The God Delusion and I couldn't finish them. There's always a part of me that's open to the atheist message (being a former atheist) and I was looking forward to some good intellectual grist for the mill.

    What I got was a rant. Both books were little more than a rant with precious little academic or intellectual reasoning applied to the argument of God's existence.

    Both writers concluded that life sucks and Christians behave badly at times so therefore 'God is not Great' or doesn't exist at all. Things like war, poverty and human imperfection are proof that God does not exist and they bring forth examples of all of the above which they then wittily attack, as if their superior wit and acerbic tone is sufficient to win the argument.

    I read The Real Case for Christ by Lee Strobel (I wasn't impressed with the first version) and he brings far more intellectual and academic rigor to his arguments for God's existence than Hitchen's or Dawkin's which surprised me. I usually expect Christian writers to be vague and disingenuous though that has changed over the past 10 years. Many (not all) Christian writers can be counted on to be intellectually honest and vigorous.

    I have to finish these books one day but honestly, the first chapters of each bored me and left wholly uninspired. Is this all you've got I ask?

    The irony of course is that both men are as closed minded as any Jerry Falwell-type or other far right Christian zealots and just as inclined to trample on individual rights if given half a chance. They all believe they possess the truth which is quite funny.

    They'll tell you too that they are enlightened.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 4:54 PM  

  • I watched Bill Maher, who grew up a catholic deny his faith on his talk show and the one question I'd like to ask is this. If you don't believe in God an infinite being then who can you believe in, only yourself?
    How scary is that. If I only have myself to believe in then I can't see the future, I don't have the strength to defend my self nor the wisdom to know what to do in many situations cause I'm finite.
    If I had to live life only relying on myself then I think I couldn't handle facing much & the fear would totally overwhelm me.
    Because I can pray & ask for help from the creator of all things( He knows what I don't) then I have the courage to get up each day with optimism.
    I feel sorry for all the atheists going it alone.
    Regards Liz

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:51 PM  

  • I thoroughly agree with Glenn. You do not change a person's mind with belittling or beguiling. I find that when people practice what they preach with gentleness and understanding and less judging then minds change on their own - if they are meant to change.
    There is nothing wrong with a difference of opinion, it does not lessen or invalidate your belief.
    Engaging fuels the fire and gives people the newsworthy power they are looking for, whereas disengaging allows the fire to die out. If we live Christian lives with joy and grace then more people will want to model that than bitterness and a vitriolic existence.

    By Blogger Irondog, at 6:18 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home